What do you mean by 生存的使命 (duty of life?)? I'm not quite sure how you jump from "I'm not restricted by 生存的使命" to "there's no meaning of life."
Sartre thinks that people have responsibility to make use of their own freedom. One can come to the conclusion that he should end his own life. But one also needs to ask himself, is that really his own free choice, or is that an outcome of his "bad faith"?
As I remember, another philosophical argument against suicide is that, the goal of committing suicide is self-defeating, so any claim for suicide cannot be true (Kant?).
4 Comments:
生存下去的理由和生存的意義有小小差別.
我下一分鐘, 下一個鐘, 下一日, 下一月有野要做, 唔代表係我一分鐘, 下一個鐘, 下一日, 下一月的生存意義.
我要食飯係咪我既生存意義?
所以你的進路變成係,如果我做完一d野,我就覺得有機會做呢樣野就感到生存好可貴.「生きてよかった！」
於是,只要我生活下去,我一定可以找到一些東西是可以"叫我生存下去". 亦給我每"一刻"的"生存意義".
我的本質(生存意義),會隨著我的生命延續而不斷增加.這,正是沙特的[存在先於本質] 人是不停由之前的每一刻所建立,但又是絕對的自由.
但是如果我是有絕對的自由,那我就是不受我"生存的使命"所限制. 故"生存的使命"可有可無(我有唔做的權利,自由). 所以, 人生是"沒有意義".
你有咩意見?
What do you mean by 生存的使命 (duty of life?)? I'm not quite sure how you jump from "I'm not restricted by 生存的使命" to "there's no meaning of life."
Sartre thinks that people have responsibility to make use of their own freedom. One can come to the conclusion that he should end his own life. But one also needs to ask himself, is that really his own free choice, or is that an outcome of his "bad faith"?
As I remember, another philosophical argument against suicide is that, the goal of committing suicide is self-defeating, so any claim for suicide cannot be true (Kant?).
Ivy @ office
謝謝雨位的留言.
本來我於文中也提到了.讓我們姑且不是以哲學的角度來說什麼生存不生存的意義.寫這寫本來是想大家想想每日生活中其實有很多微不足道的小快樂.讓我們回到最簡的快樂.
若說到認真討論,首先,我還沒有看過沙特的東西,故很難明白CHRIS說的[存在先於本質],很難有什麼意見.
不過我跟IVY有同一個問題,找不到你把結論跳到人生是"沒有意義"的軌跡.
我每下一刻的行為都不受我之前一刻所限制. 如果我是一個大壞蛋,我可以係下一秒做一個好人而絕對唔會因為我係一個大壞蛋而唔做一個好人. 所以我係有絕對的自由.
而沙特亦都話,人係沒有不自由的自由.
如果人是有生存的使命, 而生存的使命係要你做某一d野,好似耶穌要救世人咁.
而我係有自由決定下一個行為不受任何事限制的話, 那我就算有一個生存的使命, 我也可以不服從. 於是, 生存使命有等於冇了.
Post a Comment
<< Home